USPTO serial 75927175
MEET MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEET MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Purvi J. Patel
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING ON-LINE INDEXES OF INFORMATION INCLUDING ELECTRONIC CATALOGS, INTERACTIVE DIRECTORIES, AND OTHER RESOURCES ACCESSED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AN ON-LINE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOR VENDORS AND CONSUMERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC SERVICES IN ORDER TO PURCHASE AND SELL SUCH GOODS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SERVICES, AND ELECTRONIC SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |