USPTO serial 75927251
SORRENTO NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2950412Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SORRENTO NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL NETWORK ELEMENT HARDWARE, NAMELY SYSTEMS AND SUBSYSTEMS COMPRISED OF TRANSPONDERS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, MULTIPLEXES, OPTICAL BAND AND WAVELENGTH FILTERS, AMPLIFIERS, OPTICAL SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, OPTICAL AND ELECTRICAL SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MONITORINGS, SYSTEM CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT MODULES; EMBEDDED OPTICAL NETWORK ELEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FIRMWARE THAT ADDS NETWORK INTELLIGENCE, FUNCTIONS AND FEATURES TO THE AFOREMENTIONED HARDWARE; AND OPTICAL NETWORK ELEMENT AND OPTICAL NETWORK MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE DEVELOPED FOR MONITORING, CONTROL, PROVISIONING, CONFIGURATION, RECONFIGURATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED NETWORK ELEMENT HARDWARE AND FIRMWARE AS WELL AS THE OPTICAL NETWORKS RESULTING FROM THE INTERCONNECTION OF NETWORK ELEMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SORRENTO NETWORKS I, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sorrento Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sorrento Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SORRENTO NETWORKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SORRENTO NETWORKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |