USPTO serial 75927272
PIRATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3137445Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIRATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
Charles P. LaPolla Ostrolenk Faber LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED AUDIO TAPES, COMPACT DISKS, VIDEO TAPES AND VIDEO DISKS FEATURING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FRASERSIDE IP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PIRATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |