USPTO serial 75927414
CELLONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
CHARLES L PERRY ESQ ANDREWS KURTH LLP36TH FL1717 MAIN ST STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PENS AND PENCILS; NOTEBOOKS; FOLDERS; MAGNETIC WIPE OFF BOARDS; DOCUMENT HOLDERS; MAGNETIC PHONE NUMBER CARD INDEX; LETTER OPENERS; DECALS; PLASTIC SHOPPING BAGS; CLIPBOARDS; PERSONAL ORGANIZERS; RULERS; ROAD ATLASES; NOTEPADS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |