USPTO serial 75927818
IB LASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2840553Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IB LASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori T Milvain
LORI T MILVAIN GRONEK & LATHAM, LLPSTE 600390 N ORANGE AVEORLANDO, FL 32801Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.M. USA IPM + T, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.M. USA IPM + T, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IB LASER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |