USPTO serial 75928058
BUZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
FLORISTS TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
Leesburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS, PLANTS, FOOD BASKETS AND GIFTS OF OTHERS THROUGH PRINT AND BROADCAST MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VALUE NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VALUE NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VickieLynne Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BUZZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |