USPTO serial 75928197
WEBX SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBX SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston H. Smirman
WBEX SOLUTIONS10 W LONG LK STE 30BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Computer network installation for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing computer software application development, customization, namely, customizing computer software applications for businesses, installation, modification, namely, modifying computer software applications for businesses, and computer network design and implementation services, namely, designing and implementing computer networks for businesses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |