USPTO serial 75928266
FORT EVANS FINEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORT EVANS FINEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Lyon
DANIEL P LYON MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC11350 RANDOM HILLS RD STE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | salad dressings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |