USPTO serial 75928380
NESBITT BURNS CAPITAL MARKETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NESBITT BURNS CAPITAL MARKETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWATWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications namely newsletters, pamphlets, magazines and booklets published periodically related to matters of securities, economics, fiscal, banking, financial, investment, brokerage and educational interest; financial publications namely newsletters, pamphlets, magazines, booklets relating to financial services and investment strategies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | banking services; investment services relating to securities, investment of funds for other, investment management services; corporate banking; investment dealer services; investment banking transactions; mergers and acquisitions advice; financial advisory services; financial services, namely brokerage accounts and services; securities services, namely, securities brokerage, financial research and advisory services related to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |