USPTO serial 75928389
HI-TECH SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HI-TECH SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Ostfeld
DAVID M OSTFELD CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA, WHITE WILLIAMS E1200 SMITH ST STE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77002-4310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Trapezoidal roofs featuring three locking capabilities for lock seams, running the seams to create a lock or a second overlaying lock or a third overlaying lock in which the material for the roof is metal, combined with availability of corrosion coatings and optionally color coatings specific to end need and available in a 24-inch configuration | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |