Drawing for HI-TECH SERIES

USPTO serial 75928389

HI-TECH SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-TECH SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Ostfeld

DAVID M OSTFELD CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA, WHITE WILLIAMS E1200 SMITH ST STE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77002-4310UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Trapezoidal roofs featuring three locking capabilities for lock seams, running the seams to create a lock or a second overlaying lock or a third overlaying lock in which the material for the roof is metal, combined with availability of corrosion coatings and optionally color coatings specific to end need and available in a 24-inch configurationACTIVEDec 10, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance