USPTO serial 75929039
PANATHON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANATHON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN
JOSEPH P SULLIVAN17 SUN CTRIVERHEAD, NY 11901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, hats, shoes, headbands, wristbands, pants, pajamas, belts, sweatshirts, sports shirts, polo shirts, jackets, vests, socks, footwear, hiking boots | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging, organizing and conducting athletic competitions; arranging and conducting sporting events, races and tournaments, namely, point to point distance races in the sports of running, swimming, cross-country skiing and biking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |