Drawing for WINDOW WASH

USPTO serial 75929155

WINDOW WASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEYER JR, BROOKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINDOW WASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER THE FIRM OF MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003DETERGENT FOR INDUSTRIAL USE IN CLEANING SURFACES, NAMELY, GLASS TABLE TOPS, GLASS STORE FRONT WINDOWS, AND GLASS DOOR PANELSACTIVEOct 12, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 26, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 15, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance