USPTO serial 75929172
Serial No. 75929172
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2652821Status 712
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75929172?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Deveau
TODD DEVEAU THOMAS HORSTEMEYER LLP400 INTERSTATE NORTH PKWY SESTE 1500ATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | tires having light gray tread | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |