USPTO serial 75929247
THE LOOK OF DAYTIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LOOK OF DAYTIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN J STRAUSS
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR 10TH FL6060 CTR DRLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIP STICKS, LIP PENCILS, LIP SEALANT, LIP LINER, LIP CREAMS, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALMS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYE LINERS, COSMETIC PENCILS, MASCARA, FACE AND BODY POWDERS, FOUNDATION MAKE UP, CONCEALER, BLUSHES, COLOGNE AND PERFUME; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR LOTIONS, HAIR MOUSE, HAIR COLOR, HAIR GELS AND HAIR POMADES; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZERS, CLEANSERS, TONERS, FACIAL MASKS, HAND AND SKIN LOTIONS, HAND AND SKIN CREAMS, EYE CREAMS, FACE CREAMS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDERS, BODY CREAMS, BODY EMULSIONS, AND BODY MASKS; DEPILATORY CREAMS; BATH BEADS; BATH CRYSTALS; BATH GELS AND BATH SOAPS; SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUN CREAMS, SUN TAN LOTIONS AND OILS, AFTER-SUN LOTIONS, SELF-TANNING LOTIONS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL BUFFING PREPARATIONS, NAIL CREAMS, NAIL ENAMELS, NAIL HARDENERS, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH COAT BASE AND NAIL POLISH TOP COAT, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, CUTICLE CONDITIONERS, CUTICLE CREAMS, CUTICLE REMOVING PREPARATIONS, AND NAIL TIPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |