USPTO serial 75929740
Serial No. 75929740
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75929740?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
American Fork, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott L. Worthington
SCOTT L WORTHINGTON ROBINSON,SEILER& GLAZIER,LC80 N 100 EP O BOX 1266PROVO, UT 84603-1266Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic advertising display accessed through a global computer network; promoting the sale of goods and services of others by giving users cash incentives to visit online businesses and to make purchases while charging the online businesses only for the results | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
| 041 | Providing arts, entertainment and sports information via a global communication network | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
| 042 | Providing technical information in the fields of science, computers health, fashion and restaurants | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jan 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |