USPTO serial 75929747
SINAMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2002
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SINAMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Heinz Weyermann GmbH Farbmalzbierbrauerei
D-96052 Bamberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Heinz Weyermann GmbH Farbmalzbierbrauerei
HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
Bamberg, DE
HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
BAMBERG, DE
HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
BAMBERG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Handelsman
Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CONCENTRATED EXTRACTS FROM ROASTED MALT USED FOR FLAVORING AND COLORING FOOD AND BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heinz Weyermann GmbH Farbmalzbierbrauerei
- Other trademarks owned by HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
- Other trademarks owned by HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
- Other trademarks owned by HEINZ WEYERMANN ROSTMALZBIERBRAUEREI BAMBERG GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SINAMAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 15, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |