USPTO serial 75929807
SPEECHSPOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPEECHSPOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R STEINBERG
DONALD R STEINBERG HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for speech-based advertisement and interactive speech systems used to route calls and direct callers to interactive information and to enable callers and service providers to conduct business or personal transactions through voice activated means; computer software used to create, manage, edit, store, and play telephone-based advertisements; computer software and hardware used for speech recognition and voice activation; and utility software for speech-based advertisement and interactive speech systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing speech-based advertisements on automated telephone information systems; cooperative marketing and advertising services; providing information in the field of speech-based advertisements; and consulting related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing technical consultation and information in the field of computer software and hardware used in connection with speech-based advertisement and interactive speech systems, telephone-based advertisements, speech content management, interactive speech, voice recognition, text to speech, speech browsing and voice-enabled security systems; customized design, programming, installing and testing of interactive speech, voice recognition, telephone-based advertisement, text to speech, speech browsing and voice-enabled systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of interactive speech, voice recognition, telephone-based advertisement, text to speech, speech browsing and voice-enabled security systems via telephone and on-line electronic means; installation and maintenance of computer software used for interactive speech, voice recognition, telephone-based advertisement, text to speech, speech browsing and voice-enabled security; via telephone and on-line electronic means; installation and maintenance of computer software used for interactive speech, voice recognition, telephone-based advertisement, text to speech, speech browsing and voice-enabled security; installation, maintenance and development of speech and voice system software comprising recorded messages, telephone-based advertisements, names, and content; and consulting services in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Speechworks International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Speechworks International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPEECHSPOTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |