USPTO serial 75929820
CANADIAN METALLIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANADIAN METALLIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRACY-GENE G. DURKIN
TRACY-GENE G DURKIN STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & PLLC1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Brake pads, brake blocks and brake linings for land motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |