USPTO serial 75930029
POSITECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSITECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-4058 Basel, CH
CH-4058 Basel, CH
Greensboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Friedman
JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Novartis AG
- Other trademarks owned by Novartis AG
- Other trademarks owned by Syngenta Participations AG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named POSITECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |