USPTO serial 75930613
CRISTALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRISTALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69200 VENISSIEUX, FR
69200 VENISSIEUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Gilly
RICHARD P GILLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LONE PENN CTR - STE 15001617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVDPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-1815Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor coaches, motor buses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |