USPTO serial 75930667
OMNIAXS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNIAXS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy K. Sterns
RANDY K STERNS BUSH ROSS GARDNER WARREN & RUDY, PA220 S FRANKLIN STTAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONCURRENTLY TRANSMITTING VOICE, FAX AND DATA OVER A PACKETIZED DATA NETWORKS, NAMELY, THE GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, AND WIDE AREA NETWORKS, AND FOR ENABLING PUBLICLY SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS TO INTERFACE WITH INTERNET AND INTRANET PROVIDER NETWORKS VIA GATEWAY SWITCHES | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 1998 |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE OF TURNKEY INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEPHONY SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS THAT ALLOW VOICE AND DATA TO BE TRANSMITTED BETWEEN PUBLICLY SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS, THE INTERNET, AND PRIVATE NETWORKS, TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF TURNKEY INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEPHONY SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS THAT ALLOW VOICE AND DATA TO BE TRANSMITTED BETWEEN PUBLICLY SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS, THE INTERNET, AND PRIVATE NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |