Drawing for ENGAGESTREAM

USPTO serial 75930675

ENGAGESTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGAGESTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Kulish

BENJAMIN E LEACE RATNERPRESTIAONE WESTLAKES, BERWYN, STE 301PO BOX 980VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication conference services, namely, end-user, streaming video teleconference services in which the services are provided by means of a telecommunication network or global computer network; end-user, streaming video teleconference services for video teleconferences that are conducted over a telecommunication network or global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2005CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance