Drawing for NOTHING'S MADE BETTER

USPTO serial 75930716

NOTHING'S MADE BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOTHING'S MADE BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel E. Lutzker

JOEL E LUTZKER SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, bushings, ball bearings and hydro-dynamic bearings; electric motors and component parts thereof for machinesACTIVE—
009Computer keyboards, cooling fans for electric equipment, audio speakers, electric power supplies, electrical and integrated circuits, magnets and electrical components, namely, inductorsACTIVE—
037Repair and maintenance of computer keyboards, electric motors and component parts thereof, cooling fans for electric equipment, hydro-dynamic bearings, audio speakers, electric power supplies, electrical and integrated circuits, magnets and electrical components, namely, inductorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance