USPTO serial 75930905
ATOCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATOCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Takehara-shi, Hiroshima-ken, JP
Takehara-shi, Hiroshima-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
ROBERT P MICHAL FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN, ET AL767 THIRD AVE25TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROTECTIVE GLOVES FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, PROTECTIVE INDUSTRIAL WORK GLOVES, PROTECTIVE NITRILE RUBBER WORK FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | GLOVES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, WORK GLOVES, NAMELY, DUSTING GLOVES, GARDENING GLOVES, STRETCHERS GLOVE, POLISHING GLOVES, RUBBER SHEET LINE WORK GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | THERMAL GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ATOM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ATOM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ATOCOM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |