USPTO serial 75930933
URBANHIPSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBANHIPSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin F Kostyn
KEVIN F KOSTYN WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT & MORGAN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION AND REVIEWS REGARDING RESTAURANTS, MUSIC VENUES, HOTELS, GALLERIES, MOVIES, VIDEOS, PUBLICATIONS, POPULAR CULTURE, FASHION, MULTIMEDIA AND OTHER CONSUMER MERCHANDISE AND SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING AUDIOVISUAL AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING RESTAURANTS, MUSIC VIDEOS, HOTELS, GALLERIES, MOVIES, VIDEOS, PUBLICATIONS, FASHION, MULTIMEDIA OTHER CONSUMER MERCHANDISE VIA A COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING LINKS TO THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |