Drawing for PGI DIFCO

USPTO serial 75930963

PGI DIFCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2616396Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 10, 2002
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PGI DIFCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC430 Davis DriveSuite 500Morrisville, NC 27560

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Aramid and aramid-blend fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothing worn by firefighters, utility, industrial and chemical workers; and greige fabrics for use in the flocking, abrasive, [bookbinding,] footwear and general coating industries for the manufacture of coating applications such as flocked fabrics, and paper belts, book covers, rubber coating, vinyl coating and laminating; and greige fabrics for use in the filtration, [food packaging] and promotional accessories industries, and for apparel converters, for the manufacture of such specialty items as filtration bags, [ food packaging, ] promotional bags, [ high end sportswear and career apparel ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 10, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 10, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 14, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 4, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 16, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 14, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jan 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance