USPTO serial 75930972
VISDEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISDEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN A. HEIBERG
KATHRYN A HEIBERG HEIBERG LAW OFFICE245 S KLORAMA STVENTURA, CA 93001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer authoring software for developing computer programs for use on computer communications networks, namely, utility programs for developing and delivering applications with textual, graphical, audio, and audiovisual content; computer software programs for developing server applications with dynamic displays; computer software for accessing databases via computer communications networks; computer software programs for allowing users to visualize, analyze, and evaluate content and function for (indicate specific purpose); computer software and software development tools, namely, (specify tools by common commercial name) for processing information communicated by local and global computer networks, and instruction manuals supplied as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |