Drawing for MOUNTAIN BLEND

USPTO serial 75931074

MOUNTAIN BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOUNTAIN BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD S. SHENIER

RICHARD S SHENIER SHENIER & O' CONNOR1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CoffeeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 23, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 31, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance