USPTO serial 75931120
CYBERNET EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERNET EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen L. Winslow
HELEN L WINSLOW RICHARDS LAYTON & FINGERONE RODNEY SQP O BOX 551WILMINGTON, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing audio, video and text conferencing services for transmission and reception of communications, among users of electronic communication networks; communication services, namely providing audio, video and text communication via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services facilitating interactive audio, video and text discussions among users of global computer and communication networks; providing a forum accessible amongst electronic users for live (and archived) audio, and text discussion of a wide range of general interest topics and mature-theme matter, on a broad scope of subjects via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing on-line facilities for real-time audio, video and text interaction with other computer users; computer services, namely, providing facilities for participatory entertainment, live (and archived) audio, video and text, and social interaction over global computer and communication networks; facilitating the search, retrieval, transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information and general interest topics; providing on-line links to a wide range of information and other resources available on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |