USPTO serial 75931238
GENIDAQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENIDAQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES C. H. WU, ESQ.
CHARLES C H WU WU & CHEUNG LLP7700 IRVINE CTR DR STE 710IRVINE, CA 92618-3043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer utility software | ABANDONED | Apr 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |