USPTO serial 75931336
ESSENTUS MERCHANDISING EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESSENTUS MERCHANDISING EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL. Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAUSTE 1100. 1500 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE GENERAL RETAIL AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USED TO PROVIDE CLIENTS WITH CORE CAPABILITIES FOR MERCHANDISING, INVENTORY CONTROL, PURCHASE ORDER MANAGEMENT, CUSTOMER PROFILING AND SALES TRACKING AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |