USPTO serial 75931344
ESSENTUS EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESSENTUS EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAUSTE 1100, 1500 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE GENERAL RETAIL AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USED TO PROVIDE CLIENTS WITH CORE CAPABILITIES FOR MERCHANDISING, INVENTORY CONTROL, PURCHASE ORDER MANAGEMENT, CUSTOMER PROFILING AND SALES TRACKING; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE GENERAL RETAIL AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USED TO LINK RETAILERS OR MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR CONTRACTORS AND RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIERS WITH MODULES FOR PURCHASE AND PRODUCTION ORDERS, IMPORT TRACKING, PRODUCTION TRACKING AND MULTI-LEVEL BILL OF MATERIALS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR THE GENERAL RETAIL AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES WHICH ENABLES MANUFACTURERS TO EFFECTIVELY CONTROL CUSTOMER DEMAND AND ENSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE GOODS ARE PROVIDED TO THEM; AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |