USPTO serial 75931386
Serial No. 75931386
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75931386?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony D. Chen
TONY D CHEN ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LAMPS, LANTERNS, CHANDELIERS, SCONCES, PENDANTS, HALOGEN LAMPS, CEILING FIXTURES, WALL FIXTURES, BRACKET, MOUNTING BASE, GLASS SHADES, CANDLE BANDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL STORE AND ORDERING SERVICES VIA A WORLD WIDE WEB SITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, FEATURING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LAMPS, LANTERNS, CHANDELIERS, SCONCES, PENDANTS, HALOGEN LAMPS, CEILING FIXTURES, WALL FIXTURES, BRACKET, MOUNTING BASE, GLASS SHADES, CANDLE BANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |