USPTO serial 75931519
KID SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KID SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Appleton, WI
Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Appleton, WI
Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Appleton, WI
Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven E. Feldman
Steven E. Feldman Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP125 S. Wacker Dr., 2900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flashlights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named KID SAFE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |