USPTO serial 75931536
MAIN STREET CONNECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAIN STREET CONNECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE BEALL ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Greeting cards, file cards, note cards, message cards posters, envelopes; stationery, namely, tent cards, writing paper, note paper, order forms, business cards, napkins, gift certificates, lunch bags, art prints, and gift wrapping paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweat pants, sweat shirts, pullovers, neckties, suits, Jackets, pants, sweaters, shorts, vests, scarves, socks, underwear, hats, caps, aprons and polo shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pastries, coffee, donuts, pizza, processed cereals, namely, oat, wheat, corn, bean and wheat-based cereals; chocolates, candy, prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; coffee beans, ice cream, ice cream cones, muffins, breads, cookies, hot chocolate, tea, coffee based beverages, specialty coffees, espresso; and fruit ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Live flowers and cut flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant and contract food services, including fast food, coffee shop, kiosk and take-out food and beverage services; and architectural design in the nature of food court design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MISTER COFFEE & SERVICES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAIN STREET CONNECTION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |