Drawing for RHEO-RUBBER

USPTO serial 75931774

RHEO-RUBBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHEO-RUBBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond D. Thompson

RAYMOND D THOMPSON WORLD HEADQUARTERSLAW DEPTUNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INCMIDDLEBURY, CT 06749

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Free-flowing particles of polymeric material used in compounding in the rubber and plastics manufacturing industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 3, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance