USPTO serial 75931794
DIGITALSCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITALSCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON DC -2201,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | laser film recorder | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | treatment and preparation of films using anamorphic squeeze process in the creation of digital intermediate negatives by recording from digits in film resolution onto a film negative; digital film post-production services consisting of high resolution film scanning to digits; film editing; film compositing to a new film negative; film transformation, namely, providing conversion of motion picture film to a new film negative | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | film production, excluding the preparation and/or creation of special effects | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | technical and educational consulting services in the fields of digital film post-production, production of computer software, and film production; and computer programming services for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Film Lab Copenhagen A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Film Lab Copenhagen A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGITALSCOPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |