USPTO serial 75931804
ORIGINAL BARTENDERS COCKTAILS DULCE DE LECHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORIGINAL BARTENDERS COCKTAILS DULCE DE LECHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL M LEWIS
PAUL M LEWIS CHARLES JACQUIN ET CIE INC2633 TRENTON AVEPHILADELPHIA, PA 19125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic cocktails | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |