Drawing for FIBERLESS HORIZONPORT

USPTO serial 75931846

FIBERLESS HORIZONPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBERLESS HORIZONPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M IRIS HESS

M IRIS HESS C/O LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic senders and receivers for wireless transmission of speech, text, sound, images and data; computer program storage devices, namely diskettes, CDRoms and hard drives; computer systems comprised of hardware and software featuring integrated network management solutions to communication and media distribution solutions including storage devices for information retrieval; information handling systems comprised of storage devices and system solutions including software program for information processing and information retrieval; radio communication and distribution system comprised of transmitters and receivers; telecommunication systems for communication and distribution comprised of radio and optical transmission devices for air transmission comprised of transmitters and receivers in the optical frequency bands; and data communication systems for communication and distribution comprised of radio and/or optical transmission devices for air borne transfer in a Municipal Area Network (MAN) and/or arrangements in MESH network topologies arrangement not excluding possible use of Internet IP communicationACTIVE—
035ADMINISTRATION, MANAGING AND LICENSING OF COPYRIGHTS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELDS OF RADIO AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—
037Installation, service and repair of computers, radio, telecommunication and data systems; maintenance of computer hardware, radio, telecommunication and data systemsACTIVE—
042Technical consulting in the field of communications system solutions, research of customers' requirements regarding communication and media distribution by use of global information technology networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance