USPTO serial 75932071
MAXWELL & WILLIAMS DESIGNER HOMEWARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2006
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MAXWELL & WILLIAMS DESIGNER HOMEWARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
North Richmond, Victoria, 3121, AU
Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
North Richmond, Victoria, 3121, AU
Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
Brooklyn VIC, AU
Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher R. Butler
Christopher R. Butler HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP200 Public Square, Suite 2800Cleveland, OH 44114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ TABLEWARE, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS AND CUTLERY OF ] [ PRECIOUS METAL ] [ AND NON-PRECIOUS METAL ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | GLASSWARE, NAMELY, BEVERAGE GLASSES, BOWLS, PLATTERS, PLATES, [CUPS, SAUCERS, MUGS, VASES,] SERVING PLATTERS, SERVING BOWLS, SERVING DISHES, [TUREENS, CASSEROLE DISHES, CAKE PLATES, GRAVY BOATS, CONDIMENT DISHES,] [ JAM JARS,][ HONEY POTS,] [ SUGAR SHAKERS, ] [SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, CRUETS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL,] JUGS, [ DECANTERS,] [BOTTLES AND JARS ] FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE; DINNERWARE, namely, GLASSES, BOWLS, PLATTERS, PLATES, CUPS, SAUCERS, MUGS, [VASES, ] SERVING PLATTERS, SERVING BOWLS, SERVING DISHES, TUREENS, CASSEROLE DISHES, CAKE PLATES, GRAVY BOATS, CONDIMENT DISHES, [ JAM JARS,] [HONEY POTS, ][ SUGAR SHAKERS, ] SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, [CRUETS] AND JUGS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE MADE OF PORCELAIN; [ STONEWARE, ACRYLIC AND MELAMINE;] COOKWARE, namely, SERVING PLATTERS, BAKING DISHES, OVEN TO TABLE WARE, [ CANISTERS,] POTS AND PANS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE MADE FROM [ GLASS,] PORCELAIN, * AND * STONEWARE; [ ACRYLIC, STEEL, IRON, ALUMINUM AND MELAMINE;] [* STEEL CANISTERS;*] SERVING WARE, namely, BOWLS, PLATTERS, PLATES, SERVING PLATTERS AND JUGS MADE FROM PORCELAIN; [ STONEWARE, ACRYLIC AND MELAMINE;] TABLE WARE, namely, [CANDLEHOLDERS AND] SERVING SPOONS, [SERVING FORKS,] [ SERVING KNIVES,] [SALAD TONGS,] MADE FROM [ GLASS, PORCELAIN, STONEWARE,] ACRYLIC [ AND MELAMINE ] FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE [ AND VASES MADE OF GLASS, PORCELAIN, STONEWARE, ACRYLIC AND MELAMINE ][] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by H.A.G. Import Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MAXWELL & WILLIAMS DESIGNER HOMEWARES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | NP89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL SEC. 8 & 9 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |