USPTO serial 75932206
BIG COOL BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG COOL BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Ronald Robins
KIRT S ONEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | thermal insulated tote bags for food | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |