USPTO serial 75932246
EW8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EW8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M Kent
EVAN M KENT RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONSUMER ELECTRONICS; AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS; AUDIO SPEAKERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPE PLAYERS; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; VIDEO CAMERAS; COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER DISC DRIVES; COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER PRINTERS; COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMPUTERS; DVD PLAYERS AND RECORDERS; ELECTRONIC ENCRYPTION UNITS; FACSIMILE MACHINES; LOUDSPEAKERS; MODEMS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; OPTICAL SCANNERS; RADIOS; AUDIO AND VIDEO RECEIVERS; TELEPHONES; TELEVISION SETS; VIDEO TERMINALS; AND PHYSICAL COMBINATIONS OF ANY OF THE ABOVE, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |