Drawing for CARDEX INTERNETCARD

USPTO serial 75932404

CARDEX INTERNETCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CARDEX INTERNETCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALAN SAFAHI

ALAN SAFAHI CARD EXPRESS INC13766 ALTON PKWY STE 150IRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, providing prepaid debit cards for use over the global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 20, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2000AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance