USPTO serial 75932505
Q*BERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q*BERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Fruchter
LYNN S FRUCHTER COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's activity books, doll cutout books, address books, story books, coffee table books, namely, books concerning computer and electronic games and their characters, coloring books, comic books, diaries, how-to books, namely books instructing techniques for playing and winning computer and electronic games, general feature magazines, movie souvenir books, crayons and markers, musical and talking storybooks, posters, published scripts of motion pictures, feature and short films and computer and electronic game dialogue, calendars, gift wrapping paper, greeting cards, memo pads, party paper goods, namely, paper hats, plates, cups, napkins and tablecloths, and paper party decorations, postcards, trading cards; photo albums; day-date planners; playing cards; decals and stickers; temporary tattoos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |