Drawing for WOW

USPTO serial 75932816

WOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L WISZ

DAVID L WISZ CARLSON GASKEY & OLDS400 W MAPLE RD STE 350BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES VIA CABLE TELEVISION, TELEPHONE, INTERACTIVE TELEVISION, INTERACTIVE SWITCHED DIGITAL AND ANALOG SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELEPHONIC ACCESS THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND ETHERNET DATA TRANSMISSION OVER THE TYPE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TYPICALLY KNOWN AS "BROAD BAND" AND PROVIDED BY A FRANCHISEE AS PART OF A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH A COMMUNITY TO INDIVIDUALS IN THAT COMMUNITYACTIVEJun 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 9, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 2000IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Nov 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance