USPTO serial 75932941
O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2005
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BAE SYSTEMS SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS, LLC
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Other trademarks owned by BAE SYSTEMS SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS, LLC
Fairfield, OH
O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM M. COHEN, ESQ.
ADAM M COHEN ESQ KANE KESSLER, PC1350 AVE OF THE AMERICAS26TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Custom designed and refurbished motor vehicles, including fully armored and light armored vehicles, blast protected vehicles, parade cars, and cash-in-transit money transport vehicles; armoring kits installable by the user designed to fit commercial and military land vehicles, aircraft comprised of high hard steel and composite armoring materials, ballistic glass, adhesives, fasteners and bracketry and rodguards for tires | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Armor plating services for personal, military and commercial vehicles; custom design and assembly of motor vehicles and materials for motor vehicles that protect against various degrees of ballistic and blast threats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely training in the fields of driving, ballistics, security, counterintelligence, surveillance and risk assessment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAE SYSTEMS SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kroll-O'Gara Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT ARMORING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named O'GARA-HESS & EISENHARDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |