USPTO serial 75933071
VERIZON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERIZON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BELL ATLANTIC TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
ARLINGTON, VA
Other trademarks owned by BELL ATLANTIC TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
ARLINGTON, VA
VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
ARLINGTON, VA
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANIS M MANNING
JANIS M MANNING VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC600 HIDDEN RDG DRC/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSEN MC HQE03H01IRVING, TX 75038-3809Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications and information technology equipment, components, supplies and systems, namely, telephone switches, coaxial and fiber optic cables and adapters, computers, microcomputers, monitors, computer display units, speakers, microphones, computer storage media namely, blank compact discs, computer memory, computer peripherals and modems; televisions and television peripheral equipment, namely, cameras, set boxes, remote control units for interactive and non-interactive use; computer programs, namely, alarm monitoring software; audio and video recordings in the field of telecommunications, information technology, safety, news, sports, entertainment, culture, business and finance, weather and travel; blank smart cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | mail-order catalog services, providing telephone and directory information via television | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Banking services; financial management, information and investment services; real estate management, rental, brokerage and information services; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic debit and credit card processing services, funds transfer and payment processing services; providing information via the telephone in the field of finance | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications and information technology services, namely transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video, and information via television; television broadcasting services; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing information via telephone and global computer networks in the field of travel | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, television and video production services; and providing news in the nature of current events reporting and entertainment information via telephone, television | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information on a wide variety of topics of general interest to the consuming public via telephone, television | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL ATLANTIC TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEP, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERIZON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |