USPTO serial 75933125
BOBBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOBBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Ward
THOMAS A WARD FLIESLER MEYER LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | SHAVING CREAM DISPENSER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |