Drawing for CABLECO TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75933195

CABLECO TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2679462Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 28, 2003
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CABLECO TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALFRED N. GOODMAN

ALFRED N. GOODMAN ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST N WSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MOLDED CABLE ASSEMBLIES; PLUGGABLE AND MODULAR POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS COMPRISING ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CABLE AND CONNECTORS FOR PROVIDING ELECTRICAL POWER TO ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 14, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 14, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 201389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jan 28, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 17, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 13, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 27, 2009815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 28, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance