USPTO serial 75933251
MATRIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MATRIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN, LLP8180 S 700 ESANDY, UT 84070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software, platform and applications, for business to business electronic commerce and enablers; computer hardware and computer software for conversion of data formats, protocols and information; computer hardware and computer software for transaction processing and the exchange of business information across multiple communications networks; computer hardware and computer software for information and telecommunications platform integration; computer hardware and computer software for interoperability and management; computer hardware and computer software for systems and hardware integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the use of computer hardware and computer software, platform and applications, for business to business electronic commerce-and enablers; training in the use of computer hardware and computer software for conversion of data formats, protocols and information; training in the use of computer hardware and computer software for transaction processing and the exchange of business information across multiple communications networks; training in the use of computer hardware and computer software for information and telecommunications platform integration; training in the use of computer hardware and computer software for interoperability and management; training in the use of computer hardware and computer software for systems and hardware integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software, platform and applications, for business to business electronic commerce and enablers; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for conversion of data formats, protocols and information; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for transaction processing and the exchange of business information across multiple communications networks; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for information and telecommunications platform integration; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for interoperability and management; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for systems and hardware integration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |